[cfe-dev] Two style questions
widman at gimpel.com
Sat Nov 10 14:19:34 CST 2007
On Nov 10, 2007, at 2:42 PM, Cédric Venet wrote:
> I know you don't want to create dependency on boost [...]
Is there really an aversion to all things Boost here?
Some things are often obviously better done with it. For example,
see the boost operator header:
It's pretty tame as boost headers go: It's short and it doesn't
depend on the MPL (or anything as mind-bending). And if you're going
to write an operator function, it seems like you should at least
explain to yourself why you think your approach is better.
More information about the cfe-dev