[llvm-commits] REPOST: llvm-gcc expensive checks patch
clattner at apple.com
Sun Jul 8 21:27:34 CDT 2007
On Jul 8, 2007, at 7:12 PM, Reid Spencer wrote:
> On Sun, 2007-07-08 at 18:57 -0700, Chris Lattner wrote:
>> On Jul 7, 2007, at 12:09 AM, Reid Spencer wrote:
>>> On Fri, 2007-07-06 at 11:51 -0500, David A. Greene wrote:
>>>> I posted this patch a while back but nothing happened with it.
>>>> llvm users who
>>>> configure with --enable-expensive-checks are currently unable to
>>>> llvm-gcc without this patch. autoconf must be re-run after
>>>> applying it.
>>>> Who is resposible for applying patches to llvm-gcc?
>>> More to the point, when is the llvm-gcc code going to migrate to the
>>> llvm.org repository ?
>> After PR1535 is fixed (the current set of svn conversion bugs).
> Well, there's some chicken-egg issues there. You can't get test-
> suite to
> build without llvm-gcc and the way llvm-top works, it expects llvm-gcc
> to be in the repository. So, I can't test that part without it in the
> repository. Same thing for hlvm.
I'm not talking about getting llvm-top going. That is orthogonal
from getting the basic web site restored to operational. I'd like to
be able to check out "test-suite" as projects/test-suite and have
that "just work" for example.
More information about the llvm-commits