[llvm-commits] PATCH: Add Version.h and macros
clattner at apple.com
Wed Oct 29 01:16:44 CDT 2008
On Oct 28, 2008, at 11:09 PM, Daniel Dunbar wrote:
> #define LLVM_RELEASE_VERSION 24
> For LLVM 2.4 etc? Is there any specific reason to track branches?
> No, there is no particular reason to track branches (especially if
> LLVM_API_VERSION is adopted). I thought it might make sense to
> provide the full information given by the PACKAGE_VERSION define
> autoconf generates. I don't see any particular reason not to provide
> As far as LLVM_RELEASE_VERSION, I prefer to encode major and minor.
I agree, I just don't see a need to do it separately.
> What is LLVM_RELEASE_VERSION 210?
More information about the llvm-commits