[LLVMdev] Forward: Discussion about custom memory allocators for STL
sabre at nondot.org
Sat May 17 21:34:11 CDT 2008
On May 17, 2008, at 7:05 PM, Óscar Fuentes wrote:
>> Boost as it has a bad name in some quarters, regardless of its
>> for including work that is not safe for commercial users to take
>> on. Ie,
>> there are so many contributors, and their contribution tracking has
>> poor in the past, that business affairs departments in commercial
>> companies, and their associated patent lawyers, are unable to
>> how much of Boost is truly the authors' own work, and how much is
> Isn't this applicable to LLVM itself?
Yes. I don't really buy that argument against using boost. There are
other valid arguments against using specific boost libraries, but
contribution tracking seems fairly minor.
More information about the LLVMdev