[LLVMdev] Problem with code generated for call using stdcall convention

[Reid Kleckner]

On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 12:21 PM, Nick Lewycky <nicholas at mxc.ca> wrote:
> Hans Wennborg wrote:
>> I too have stumbled over this.
>>
>> Wouldn't it be a good idea to add a check for this to the function
>> verifier pass?
>
> No. This is a FAQ: http://llvm.org/docs/FAQ.html#callconvwrong

IMO you could move the cc to the type and still replace mismatched
calls with unreachable.  Are there other design considerations for not
doing this?

Reid