[LLVMdev] Proposal: intp type
dag at cray.com
Fri Nov 13 08:46:58 CST 2009
On Thursday 12 November 2009 22:48, Chris Lattner wrote:
> > There is also the question of whether intptrs should be allowed as
> > *members* of vectors. I have no opinion on this, except to say that
> > it probably only makes sense in situations where you can also have
> > vectors of pointers.
> Vectors of pointers are not allowed. I think disallowing intptr in
> vectors makes perfect sense.
Then we're going to need to fix this in the IR fairly soon. We won't be
able to support architectures like Larrabee nicely until we do.
More information about the LLVMdev