dalej at apple.com
Mon Nov 16 12:43:22 CST 2009
On Nov 14, 2009, at 3:16 PMPST, Howard Hinnant wrote:
> In many places there is code that looks like:
> MBBI = next(MBBI);
> In C++0X there is a std::next that is likely to be in scope when these
> calls are made. And due to ADL the above call becomes ambiguous:
> llvm::next or std::next?
> I recommend:
> MBBI = llvm::next(MBBI);
"next" is a popular name; if it breaks llvm, I'd expect this standards
change to break a lot of existing code. Do you really want to do that?
More information about the LLVMdev